Authors: Nevin J. Harper, Carina Ribe Fernee, Markus Mattsson & Pekka Lyytinen
We often rely on our personal experiences and the stories we tell ourselves about how outdoor therapy works. We also draw on research and evidence from related fields to make claims for our own work. While outcomes research is advancing, we lag behind in process and theory-generating research. This paper centers on potential explorations of implicit theories in outdoor therapies. Implicit elements of our practice are difficult to identify and describe, due to their nature as tacit knowledge (i.e. felt, embodied, and largely intuitive) arising amidst the attunement to ourselves, other people, and nature. We propose a research agenda into implicit landscapes based on three pathways. The first pathway includes a practitioner survey to identify their guiding theories. The second pathway is context-sensitive case studies that also embrace complexity, whilst the third pathway inquiries into microprocesses of change, perhaps not yet articulated in outdoor therapies research.